The Austin Court of Appeals issued an interesting ruling on whether the courts in Texas have the power to review an agency’s refusal to engage in rulemaking. In Texas Commission on Environmental Quality v. Bonser-Latin, et al., the Court of Appeals agreed with TCEQ that the lower court had no…
Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law Blog
Operative August 28: Revised Missouri Public Prompt Payment Act
On June 20, 2014, Missouri Governor signed into law Senate Bill 529. The Act revises and expands the scope of the Missouri Public Prompt Payment Act and the law relating to public works projects. The revised provisions are operative August 28, 2014. Of note, under existing law, all public works…
New Federal Advisory Act Ruling: Court Finds Advisory Committee Report “Suspect and Untrustworthy”
Judge Richard J. Leon of the US District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled that a federal advisory committee appointed by the FDA to issue a report consistent with the agency’s new authority over the sale of tobacco products was illegally constituted. Three of the voting committee members…
Operative July 18: Revised Nebraska Construction Prompt Pay Act
In mid-April 2014, Nebraska Governor signed into law Legislative Bill 961. Of note, it includes revisions to the Nebraska Construction Prompt Pay Act. The Act is set forth in Nebraska Revised Statutes §§ 45-1201 to 45-1210 and Section 8 of L.B. 961. The revised provisions are operative July 18, 2014.…
DC Circuit Affirms $72 Million Adverse Judgment Against Volvo Powertrain
In a decision released Friday in the case of United States of America v. Volvo Powertrain Corp., the DC Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision finding that a Consent Decree entered into by several engine manufacturers to settle civil complaints that they had violated federal law by equipping certain engines…
7th Circuit Declines To Step Into Carp Controversy
The Seventh Circuit, in the case of State of Michigan, et al. v. US Army Corps of Engineers and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, once again denied a request by five states bordering on Lake Michigan seeking an injunction against the Corps and the Water Reclamation District.…
Presidential Order Contemplating No Judicial Review Is No Bar When Issue Raised Is Due Process
Recently, the DC Circuit held that a Presidential Order prohibiting a transaction to develop wind farms in Oregon because of unspecified national security issues, was violative of the constitutional guarantees of due process. The case is Ralls Corporation v. the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (an Executive…
“Enhanced Coordination Process” Memo Is a “Procedural Rule” Not A “Legislative Rule”
Recently, the DC Circuit decided the case of National Mining Association v. McCarthy. Reversing the lower court, the court held that an “Enhanced Coordination Process” memo and guidance authored by EPA and the Corps of Engineers to coordinate their joint review of coal mining Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§…
“Permit Shield” Defense Unavailable When Presence of Pollutant Was Not Disclosed In Permit Application Process
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling in the case of Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards v. A & G Coal Corporation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision in a Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251, et seq. (“CWA”), citizen suit lawsuit that A…
English Contract Law: Has the Camel’s Nose of “Good Faith” Crept Under the Tent Flap?
Today, Pillsbury attorney Ray Sweigart posted his client advisory English Contract Law: Has the Camel’s Nose of “Good Faith” Crept Under the Tent Flap? The Advisory discusses Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Ltd [2014] EWHC 2104 (Comm), which involves a challenge brought under Section 67 of…