This is Part I of VII of a brief recap of some the significant environmental law and administrative cases decided in the past few months:
I. FEDERAL COURTS
A. Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court, on June 29, 2015, in a 5 to 4 ruling, held in Michigan v. EPA, that EPA, when deciding whether it was appropriate and necessary to regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) such as, for instance, mercury and other toxic pollutants emitted from electric utility power plants, must consider the costs of compliance at this stage of the rulemaking proceedings. Continue Reading ›